Unelected health officials, politicians, and bureaucrats are abrogating our individual rights by declaring perpetual States of Emergency. They are claiming legal justification for their actions by the misuse and misinterpretation of the poisonous “Notwithstanding” clause that was injected long ago into the Canadain Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These officials further assert that their fiats emanate from higher and wiser sources and that they are only trying to keep everyone safe.
Reportedly, these ‘experts’ are being run by a small group of Technocrats who are attempting to overthrow the current system of Nation States and replace it with a global Scientific Dictatorship, a system based on the ideology of dialectic materialism, controlled by AI, run by algorithms, and enforced through social credit.
One of their claims is that “life is a behavior pattern that chemical systems exhibit when they reach a certain level of complexity”. A further sampling of the Technocratic approach can be read at https://spectator.org/the-bioethicist-pandemic/
Declarations of States of Emergency and ensuing edicts such as mandating improperly tested vaccines that have been rushed through trials should be challenged in court and argued on the basis of the merits of the case. These issues need to be freely debated on social media.
The erosion of our rights is incremental. Mandatory social distancing, mandatory quarantines, mandatory lockdowns, mandatory masks, mandatory vaccinations, mandatory microchipping – who gets to decides these things? Perhaps we will soon have mandatory prophylactic chemotherapy or mandatory gene therapy!
If these technocrats and their families were suddenly ripped from their privileged lifestyles, and isolated in some seedy motel until they agreed to be inoculated by the system that they so vigorously advocate for everyone else – notwithstanding the admitted risks of such vaccines to their health – perhaps their position regarding all this might change.
Insisting that States of Emergency overrule our basic right to protect life and liberty is not just fatuous, it is dangerous.