Extended “States of Emergency”

Do our political leaders, bureaucrats and health officers really want to go down in history as the ones who betrayed us, who programmed our society for fear, propelling us incrementally into a tyrannical, technocratic oligarchy?

A “back-door” clause in the Charter of Rights gives provincial premiers just enough wiggle room to declare perpetual states of emergency, potentially abrogating our individual rights.

As of January 20th, 2021, the 2nd “state of emergency” in Ontario, Canada was extended until “at least” February 19th. This was made possible by Premier Doug Ford and his cabinet. They recently passed legislation that takes advantage of an equivocation in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a “back-door” clause which now gives provincial premiers just enough wiggle room to declare perpetual states of emergency, potentially abrogating our individual rights.

https://www.fr24news.com/a/2021/01/ontario-extends-almost-all-emergency-orders-under-ontarios-reopening-act-by-30-days.html

Everyone here is now under a province wide “stay-at-home” order, because apparently the previous lockdowns and mitigation measures didn’t work. This is reportedly the first time in history where the healthy have been quarantined, despite the assertion of Dr. Fauci of the CDC that there is no danger of asymptomatic contagion.

We are now headed towards a police state, justified by the mantra of “keeping us all safe” and other such bromides.

Some of us – who have repeatedly acquiesced to the incremental imposition of restrictions, “temporary” lockdowns, and states of emergency – are starting to wake up to the level of control that has been achieved over every aspect of our lives. We are now headed towards a police state, justified by the mantra of “keeping us all safe” and other such bromides.

Another alleged reason is that “the health care systems in danger of being overwhelmed” – a claim that has been contradicted by journalists with videotaped evidence of near empty hospitals.

A previous CDC update claims that individuals are more likely to survive the coronavirus after contracting it. The health agency says if you have the virus between the ages of 0 to 70, you have a 99% survival rate. And if you’re over 70, the survival rate is nearly 95% .

The “Parade of the Imagined Terribles” marches on.

The conflated “Covid related” mortality rate – conveniently decoupled from the alarming increase in case numbers and hyped by a complicit media – was reportedly in line with previous flu seasons – until a highly contagious mutant strain of the virus suddenly appeared on the scene, just in time to justify a freshet of new lockdowns and restrictions.

The science at play seems to be mainly political and psychological – the science of propaganda and the manufacture of consent, the science of organized despair.

This current crisis appears to be based on half truths – manipulated and uncontextualized data, flawed computer models, a virus that has never been isolated, a PCR “test” that returns positive results for goats and fruit and dirt – and testimony from senior health organizations and their spokespersons, who regularly contradict themselves in an effort to gaslight the public.

Their fallback position is a “science” which Bruce Lee described as the “Classical Mess The science at play seems to be mainly political and psychological – the science of propaganda and the manufacture of consent, the science of organized despair.

Politicians, unelected bureaucrats, and myopic health officers, apparently incapable of 2nd order thinking, are now directing the minutiae of our daily lives – including such activities as ‘walking our dogs’ or ‘stretching our legs’ in a stroll around the block. Even the way we have sex is being curated by our chief public health officer, who recommends the practice mutual masturbate while wearing masks to avoid infecting our partners.

The damage they are doing to our society is incalculable.

Their staggering hypocrisy in violating their own rules is predictable, given the historical evidence we have of “elite privilege” under communist regimes. They appear to be infected with a Dunning–Kruger virus – the cognitive bias of illusory superiority. Their epic failure to consider the unintended consequences of their words and actions is astonishing. The damage they are doing to our society is incalculable.

Their arbitrary and destructive edicts are being enforced by police. For example, before even considering that you might have a legal exemption, you risk being tasered you if you skate outdoors or shop without a mask. You risk huge fines or imprisonment if you disobey or resist the many confusing restrictions, which appear to be open-ended enough to allow for the arbitrary determination of infraction – perhaps depending on where you are positioned in the progressive stack.

I suspect that many of our politicians will voted out of office once things return to normal, and the general public awaken to how they have been hoodwinked. Already there are major class action lawsuits being launched in Canada, and legal action against these despots has reportedly been successful internationally.

Politicians and bureaucrats should remember that the Nazi regime ended in the trials at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity.

We Could Be Lions!

We think we are in the hands of smart, educated leaders, philosopher-kings who know what’s best for the world, who actually care about what happens to us. In some rare cases, this may be true and to our benefit.

In my opinion, this is largely an illusion. There is no guarantee of character, ability, or moral-fiber just because politicians win an election. Witness some of our current federal, provincial, and local leaders and bureaucrats – their stupidly, incompetence, narcissism, and corruption – their unapologetic mendacity which borders on moral idiocy, and their tyrannical lust for power, ideological supremacy, and control of resources.

Tracking and contact tracing goes both ways!

Isn’t this evident from the current crisis; the equivocations and contradictions, the incremental erosion of our rights and freedoms? In this age of ubiquitous information, for the first time in history, our leaders and those who are pulling their strings have walked through the door where everyone can see them – and the door has clicked shut behind them. Tracking and contact tracing goes both ways! Now that they have been discovered, the only play they have left is to double down on their tyranny, continue to impose restrictions, and establish a top-down government by fiat that will leave them relatively immune from being sued or removed from power.

Isn’t it obvious by now what’s going on? Are we going to wait around while they pick us off one by one? Are we frogs cowering in a pot that’s slowly coming to a boil?
We could be lions!

And these words shall then become
Like Oppression’s thundered doom
Ringing through each heart and brain.
Heard again—again—again—
 
Rise like Lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number—
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you—
Ye are many—they are few.’

Percy B Shelly

Is There an End to the Covid-19 Pandemic?

Encourage the sharing of press releases linked below.

The Canadian people need to know what’s in store for them if government leaders and health officers continue to roll out their mandates, informed by a continually changing “science” that looks more politically woke by the day.

Imposed lockdowns, masks, social distancing, travel restrictions? According to Canada’s chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam, physical distancing and mask-wearing could be in place for 2-3 years, even with a  vaccine.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/covid-19-vaccine-tam-1.5673729

How? Well, in addition to the “notwithstanding” clause in our Charter of “Rights,” in Ontario, we now have Bill 195.  Government mandates can be flexibly extended by fiat for at least the next two years – without your input or consent.

(NB – I comply [under-protest] with all Government Edicts because I don’t want to be fined or arrested. Nor do I wish to be snitched on, or physically attacked, by virtue signallers who were formerly my fellow citizens).

What’s Next on the list?

A compulsory vaccine that, according to Dr. Tam, may not be effective? Dr. Tam says that public health officials are planning for a scenario where public health measures that have been taken so far could remain in place even after a successful vaccine is found.

In June 2020, Canada ordered 37 million syringes to be ready for COVID-19 vaccinations.

https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2020/06/02/canada-orders-37m-syringes-to-be-ready-for-covid-19-vaccinations.html

Canada just signed agreements with Pfizer and Moderna for millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccines.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/vaccine-procurement-anand-bains-1.5674820

Health Canada is in talks with China over moving forward with human clinical trials of a COVID-19 vaccine that has already been developed by a Chinese biopharmaceutical company.  (The CCP directly controls all companies in China).

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canada-still-working-with-china-on-covid-19-vaccine-despite-delay-trudeau-1.5027419#_gus&_gucid=&_gup=Facebook&_gsc=cqgYNEF

What Else is Coming Down the Pipe?

  • Contact tracing and microchipping of the population?
  • Quarantines and forcible family separations?
  • Social Credit?
  • Digital currency that would replace cash, track how people spend money?
  • A global reset?
  • All in the name of keeping you safe?

There appears to be much more to this Pandemic than a just virus.

Masked Advocate or Attorney for the Case?

Turning and turning in the widening gyre, the falcon cannot hear the falconer. The poet cannot urge the fledged word back. The bird is free. The light within its breast is greater than the voice which calls it down. – Godfrey John

Analyze the afflictive appearance as a wrong sense of a right something. – Arthur Corey

What are you seeing? What is its nature? What is it saying to you? How can it say that?

You are the Meaning Maker. Are you going to be the Masked Advocate for a virus? Rather than gambolling in search of a compromised and treacherous peace by flipping the hydra-headed coin of constructed conceptions, why not be the Attorney For The Defense and bring this virus to the Bar for right-identification.

An Analogy

We are being presented with a photoshopped version of a virus. Something may be there, but it has been overlaid with filters. This highly edited and filtered view is not an actuality. It is a suppositional opposite, that has been aggressively syndicated and proselytized. As adherents are recruited, this distorted view becomes solid conviction.

This perturbed thought may eventually take tangible shape in conscious thought. We may then be led to believe that we are objectively confined in a diseased material body, – that we have somehow entered into our own embodied thought and become subject to it. Then we may call on health practitioners and vaccines to save us. Arguably, this could all be an orchestrated hallucination and we may have bound ourselves with our own beliefs.

This could all be malpractice on a global scale and if so, it should be handled as such. Common consent is contagious, and it makes disease catching. That could be why the media seems so desperate to keep this going, because there may be nothing to this virus beyond aggressive propaganda and constant comment. If it were real, why would they need to harp on it so vociferously?

The way to counter an error is to expose it, and then contend persistently for the truth. We can address the perturbed thought, giving no heed to the body, if the so-called malignant virus that we are being presented with is not real. It may have no character or type beyond what the health officials and the media are assigning to it. Reportedly, no peer-reviewed evidence of its existence has ever been published. The “virus” may be an intellectual construct, inferred from phenomena, and syndicated to the population by aggressive suggestion.

If your premise is erroneous, your conclusions will be wrong, no matter which side of the issue you debate. You have to go further, deeper, press through to the jurisdiction where the best within you wants to situate you – where your highest ideals live.

You are called to be the Attorney for the Defense, not a Masked Advocate for the virus. Would you take the side of the Prosecutor and argue for a verdict that is detrimental to your client? Why not use your considerable intelligence to plead the case in a higher jurisdiction, where there is a standard of liberty and the potential for freedom?

What we see, hear, and feel is a mode of consciousness. It is as real as we make it and no more so. If this is true according to Quantum Physics, then what we perceive as a virus is a thought-form or a thought-force and is therefore subject to interpretation by the consciousness that conceives it. We are Meaning Makers. Our belief about a virus cathects it, producing results after its kind, and in this way we seem to experience its malignant effects.

Another way of looking  at this is to consider that the original digital file or holographic waveform of what we see as a virus has been hacked. Something has been deliberately inserted that makes the final 3D rendering projected onto your screen of space appear distorted because of this parasitical piggybacking.

If there is such a thing as a virus, then what we are seeing is a wrong sense of a right something. If viruses appear to be misbehaving, then we should send them to Sunday School.

As the Attorney for the Case you can re-identify the virus as a hieroglyph of Deity, as emanating from a single giving field of intention, and therefore harmless, useful and about its Father’s business.

For example, a better sense of microbes finds them working legitimately in the production of cheese and butter, in the counteraction of decay. They might be found promoting bodily immunization, or in some other wholesome function, such as activating our natural antifragility, our capacity to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures.

Medical Disclaimer

The information on this blog and in this article is philosophical. It is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this blog is for the purpose of discussion only and represents solely the opinions and views of the Author at the date of publication. The Author makes no representation and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained on or available through this blog, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to confirm any information obtained from or through this blog with other sources and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this web site.

States of Emergency

Unelected health officials, politicians, and bureaucrats are abrogating our individual rights by declaring perpetual States of Emergency. They are claiming legal justification for their actions by the misuse and misinterpretation of the poisonous “Notwithstanding” clause that was injected long ago into the Canadain Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These officials further assert that their fiats emanate from higher and wiser sources and that they are only trying to keep everyone safe.

TheFreeDictionary.com

Reportedly, these ‘experts’ are being run by a small group of Technocrats who are attempting to overthrow the current system of Nation States and replace it with a global Scientific Dictatorship, a system based on the ideology of dialectic materialism, controlled by AI, run by algorithms, and enforced through social credit.

One of their claims is that “life is a behavior pattern that chemical systems exhibit when they reach a certain level of complexity”. A further sampling of the Technocratic approach can be read at https://spectator.org/the-bioethicist-pandemic/

The Bioethicist Pandemic – Wesley J. Smith

Declarations of States of Emergency and ensuing edicts such as mandating improperly tested vaccines that have been rushed through trials should be challenged in court and argued on the basis of the merits of the case. These issues need to be freely debated on social media.

Andrew Wakefield releases “1986: The Act” film all about Big Pharma’s immunity from vaccine liability

The erosion of our rights is incremental. Mandatory social distancing, mandatory quarantines, mandatory lockdowns, mandatory masks, mandatory vaccinations, mandatory microchipping – who gets to decides these things? Perhaps we will soon have mandatory prophylactic chemotherapy or mandatory gene therapy!

If these technocrats and their families were suddenly ripped from their privileged lifestyles, and isolated in some seedy motel until they agreed to be inoculated by the system that they so vigorously advocate for everyone else – notwithstanding the admitted risks of such vaccines to their health – perhaps their position regarding all this might change.

Insisting that States of Emergency overrule our basic right to protect life and liberty is not just fatuous, it is dangerous.

Compliance Under Protest

Regarding the masks mandate, social distancing, and other edicts relating to COVID 19  that have been reportedly planned to follow shortly such as forced vaccination, micro-chipping and contact tracing.

We are, according to the US Secretary of State Pompeo, in the midst of a live exercise. This is a vicious game carefully planned over a long period of time by a comparatively small group of Technocrats with huge financial resources, using the latest Artificial Intelligence programs and algorithms.

The goal is ideological supremacy and global control of populations and resources. The stakes are high, there are no rules other than gaining your acquiescence, which your silence will guarantee.

All means to achieve this objective are on the table, up to and including burning everything down and resetting it.

If you resist and are physically taken down like this man, you will not only be vilified by virtue signallers looking to bolster their sense of moral superiority, you will be savaged in the media for ‘putting everyone at risk’.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGto5sKqsY4

You have to be as cunning as your opponents or you will fall into their trap. You have to prepare carefully.

The most effective strategy is to comply under protest. This  is a legal position whereby you are admitting the power of the state to force you to submit, but at the same time you are explicitly denying them your consent or agreement.

State your objection calmly and clearly, without argument. Get the names of the officials who are violating your rights and illegally forcing you to obey. Arrange to capture the whole incident on video and post it widely on every media outlet possible. Ally yourself with channels that have a wide audience.

Only in this way can you win widespread support.

Under Protest

Certain words and their definitions are important at this juncture in our history.

Abrogate – to abolish or annul by formal means; to repeal; put aside; cancel; revoke; rescind; nullify: to annul or repeal a law or pass legislation that contradicts the prior law. Abrogate also applies to revoking or withdrawing conditions of a contract.

Acquiesce – to assent tacitly; submit or comply silently or without protest. From Latin acquiēscere: to remain at rest, agree without protest.

Arrogate  – to claim presumptuously; to assume without right:
see arrogance.

Comply – To act in accordance with another’s command, request, rule, or wish: see complicit, compliance.

Mary – Metaphysical meaning (fr. Heb.) – contradiction; rebellious outcry; bitter complaint; bitterness; myrrh; bitter waters.

Tacit – refers to something done or made in silence, as in Tacit Agreement.  Implied by or inferred from actions or statements: [Latin: tacitus, silent, past participle of tacēre, to be silent.]
tacit agreement is manifested by the fact that no contradiction or objection is made and is thus inferred from the situation and the circumstances. A tacit contract is one in which it may be inferred from the conduct of the parties, that they intended to enter into a contract.

Under Protest – Acting in accordance with someone’s rules, commands, or wishes while asserting an objection to the obligation. Complying with an obligation while asserting an objection to the obligation.

An Example to illustrate how these words might be used in context.

The following represents an example of how these words could be used, in an effort to clarify their meaning contextually.

Mary considered the often-repeated explanation that the order to wear masks under certain proscribed conditions was ‘designed to keep everyone safe‘ to be fatuous. However, she complied with the Government mandate under protest, while vigorously expressing her objection, disagreement, and disapproval. She knew that If she just acquiesced to this edict, her silence could be legally interpreted as tacit agreement with the injunction.”

“She maintained that government officials, acting under the stimulus of ‘guidance’ from certain unelected health officers, were abrogating her sovereign individual rights. This countermanding was done under the pretext that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms had rendered her God-given rights ‘conditional’, and that she was now situated under the concurrent jurisdiction of a Corporation.”

“In fact, Government officials were simply arrogating to themselves the prerogative to alter, revoke, or revise individual rights – by fiat. They claimed their authority to do this was the “Notwithstanding” clause, which had been stealthily inserted into the Charter.

The Charter was designed in this way to give people the impression that Government actually granted individual rights, as opposed to guaranteeing to defend rights that already existed unconditionally.

“This meant that Governments could legally rescind Mary’s individual rights, whenever their global controllers deemed it necessary. With respect to the masks mandate, this action took the form of preplanned States of Emergency, perpetually extended on flimsy pretexts. Taking their cue from the CCP, local governments enforced compliance through contact tracing, social credit, severe fines, and in some cases, lengthy prison sentences.

These restrictions were also supported through propaganda and fake news, spread by a complicit social and mainstream media. “

Social shaming by naive virtue signallers, foolishly considering that compliance to their own subjugation made them morally superior, gave additional momentum to these draconian mandates.”