“Rather than quarrel over vaccination I recommend, if the law demand, that an individual submit to this process, that he obey the law, and then appeal to the gospel to save him from bad physical results. Whatever changes come to this century or to any epoch, we may safely submit to the providence of God, to common justice, to the maintenance of individual rights, and to governmental usages.” – Mary Baker Eddy (MBE) in Prose Works
MBE is talking about a vaccine, not an experimental medical device. Medical experiments are outlawed by the Nuremberg Code unless individual consent is given. She is also taking about a system which upholds common justice, individual rights and government usages related to a robust Constitutional Republic, not a decaying nation whose corporate legislature and system of justice have apparently been infiltrated and compromised by hostile foreign powers.
Therefore, substitute the word ‘poison’ into this paragraph and see if it still makes sense. The government is trying to coerce you into taking poison.
When Paul shook off the poisonous viper and suffered no ill effects, still, he didn’t voluntarily put his hand in the serpents mouth in order to temp God. Neither did Jesus throw himself off a cliff and then call for legions of angels to save him.
Imagine a practitioner with a patient who says, “I knew from my research that this was not a ‘vaccine’ but a medical device; and that certain public health officials had stealthily changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ to include it. I also knew that apparently dangerous side effects were being reported, that people were getting really sick and even dying.
However, I decided to allow myself to be injected with this substance because: my Government deceptively and illegally coerced me by requiring businesses to allow only those who had a COVID-ID (Certificate of Vaccination ID) passport to shop or travel; the Media claimed that the ‘vaccine’ was ‘approved’ (which is false); my Relatives pressured me to get vaccinated or I couldn’t see my grandchildren; my Employer said that if I didn’t get the jab they would fire me; and finally most of my so-called Friends persuaded me. Please heal me of its adverse effects.”
MBE gives the analogy of powerful mental opposition employed by a legislator to defeat the passage of an inhuman law. In connection with these ‘vaccines’, shouldn’t Christian Science treatment be given to establish freedom from coercion requiring us to submit to this tyranny, rather than to be protected from the adverse effects of a poison after it is voluntarily injected?
Do our political leaders, bureaucrats and health officers really want to go down in history as the ones who betrayed us, who programmed our society for fear, propelling us incrementally into a tyrannical, technocratic oligarchy?
A “back-door” clause in the Charter of Rights gives provincial premiers just enough wiggle room to declare perpetual states of emergency, potentially abrogating our individual rights.
As of January 20th, 2021, the 2nd “state of emergency” in Ontario, Canada was extended until “at least” February 19th. This was made possible by Premier Doug Ford and his cabinet. They recently passed legislation that takes advantage of an equivocation in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a “back-door” clause which now gives provincial premiers just enough wiggle room to declare perpetual states of emergency, potentially abrogating our individual rights.
Everyone here is now under a province wide “stay-at-home” order, because apparently the previous lockdowns and mitigation measures didn’t work. This is reportedly the first time in history where the healthy have been quarantined, despite the assertion of Dr. Fauci of the CDC that there is no danger of asymptomatic contagion.
We are now headed towards a police state, justified by the mantra of “keeping us all safe” and other such bromides.
Some of us – who have repeatedly acquiesced to the incremental imposition of restrictions, “temporary” lockdowns, and states of emergency – are starting to wake up to the level of control that has been achieved over every aspect of our lives. We are now headed towards a police state, justified by the mantra of “keeping us all safe” and other such bromides.
Another alleged reason is that “the health care systems in danger of being overwhelmed” – a claim that has been contradicted by journalists with videotaped evidence of near empty hospitals.
A previous CDC update claims that individuals are more likely to survive the coronavirus after contracting it. The health agency says if you have the virus between the ages of 0 to 70, you have a 99% survival rate. And if you’re over 70, the survival rate is nearly 95% .
The “Parade of the Imagined Terribles” marches on.
The conflated “Covid related” mortality rate – conveniently decoupled from the alarming increase in case numbers and hyped by a complicit media – was reportedly in line with previous flu seasons – until a highly contagious mutant strain of the virus suddenly appeared on the scene, just in time to justify a freshet of new lockdowns and restrictions.
The science at play seems to be mainly political and psychological – the science of propaganda and the manufacture of consent, the science of organized despair.
This current crisis appears to be based on half truths – manipulated and uncontextualized data, flawed computer models, a virus that has never been isolated, a PCR “test” that returns positive results for goats and fruit and dirt – and testimony from senior health organizations and their spokespersons, who regularly contradict themselves in an effort to gaslight the public.
Their fallback position is a “science” which Bruce Lee described as the “Classical Mess” The science at play seems to be mainly political and psychological – the science of propaganda and the manufacture of consent, the science of organized despair.
Politicians, unelected bureaucrats, and myopic health officers, apparently incapable of 2nd order thinking, are now directing the minutiae of our daily lives – including such activities as ‘walking our dogs’ or ‘stretching our legs’ in a stroll around the block. Even the way we have sex is being curated by our chief public health officer, who recommends the practice mutual masturbate while wearing masks to avoid infecting our partners.
The damage they are doing to our society is incalculable.
Their staggering hypocrisy in violating their own rules is predictable, given the historical evidence we have of “elite privilege” under communist regimes. They appear to be infected with a Dunning–Kruger virus – the cognitive bias of illusory superiority. Their epic failure to consider the unintended consequences of their words and actions is astonishing. The damage they are doing to our society is incalculable.
Their arbitrary and destructive edicts are being enforced by police. For example, before even considering that you might have a legal exemption, you risk being tasered you if you skate outdoors or shop without a mask. You risk huge fines or imprisonment if you disobey or resist the many confusing restrictions, which appear to be open-ended enough to allow for the arbitrary determination of infraction – perhaps depending on where you are positioned in the progressive stack.
I suspect that many of our politicians will voted out of office once things return to normal, and the general public awaken to how they have been hoodwinked. Already there are major class action lawsuits being launched in Canada, and legal action against these despots has reportedly been successful internationally.
Politicians and bureaucrats should remember that the Nazi regime ended in the trials at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity.
Encourage the sharing of press releases linked below.
The Canadian people need to know what’s in store for them if government leaders and health officers continue to roll out their mandates, informed by a continually changing “science” that looks more politically woke by the day.
Imposed lockdowns, masks, social distancing, travel restrictions? According to Canada’s chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam, physical distancing and mask-wearing could be in place for 2-3 years, even with a vaccine.
How? Well, in addition to the “notwithstanding” clause in our Charter of “Rights,” in Ontario, we now have Bill 195. Government mandates can be flexibly extended by fiat for at least the next two years – without your input or consent.
(NB – I comply [under-protest] with all Government Edicts because I don’t want to be fined or arrested. Nor do I wish to be snitched on, or physically attacked, by virtue signallers who were formerly my fellow citizens).
What’s Next on the list?
A compulsory vaccine that, according to Dr. Tam, may not be effective? Dr. Tam says that public health officials are planning for a scenario where public health measures that have been taken so far could remain in place even after a successful vaccine is found.
In June 2020, Canada ordered 37 million syringes to be ready for COVID-19 vaccinations.
Health Canada is in talks with China over moving forward with human clinical trials of a COVID-19 vaccine that has already been developed by a Chinese biopharmaceutical company. (The CCP directly controls all companies in China).
There may be more to the current crisis than what appears. On some channels, it is reported to be a Live Exercise that includes a Compliance Test and may have been in the works for some time. Evidently, the plans are incredibly sophisticated, developed by Technocrats using advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI).
For example, the hyperlinked plan on World Economic Forum is 200 levels deep.
The plan appears to involve an incremental shutdown and reset of the present system. Legislation for the successive masking, vaccinating and microchipping of the population has already been enacted or is in the works. All financial transactions will be digitized. All aspects of our lives, socially and economically, will be run by algorithms.
Some may argue that this is a good thing, considering the incredible corruption of the present system. Others claim that we are being farmed, comparing this to the Hunger Games.
I suggest that we all do our own research, as most of the regular media outlets are suspect.
In my opinion, Trump is taking his cue from recent events. Apparently, he assumes that the exercise of First Amendment Rights in Political Rallies is as essential to the nation’s health as it is in the ongoing political Protests Against Racism. Considering the size of the Trump base in America, he may have a point.
Over 1000 health professionals and doctors from across the country recently signed an open letter regarding the George Floyd protests. They argued that although Covid-19 infections are a risk, the protestor’s First Amendment rights are more relevant to the nation’s health than the mitigation of the virus. Therefore they should be allowed to continue – notwithstanding the lockdown mandates for everyone else.
The problem is that the support numbers for the Trump Rallies look like they will far exceed those of the ongoing Protests. Over 1 million people have signed up for tickets to the first one in Tulsa, Oklahoma – and this for just one Rally, in one State. Fortunately, the Tulsa facility will only accommodate a small percentage of the people who have applied to go. Masks will be distributed, and temperature checks will be administered.
Let’s hope the dire prediction of a ‘perfect storm’ made by Bruce Dart, the executive director of the Tulsa health department, does not materialize.
It seems that such predictions, and the ensuing directives relating to the Lockdown, are coming from unelected Public Health officials. In Ontario, 34 Local Health Officials are reportedly controlling the rate at which the Ford administration can proceed with the reopening of the provincial economy. A recent National Post Article harshly criticized their level of influence.
We’re all going to have to live with the consequences of decisions based on ‘guidance’ from Health Officials and Health Organizations for the foreseeable future. Many equivocations and contradictory statements have been circulating in the media since this crisis began. Is it any wonder that more and more people are beginning to question the “novel coronavirus” narrative.