You’re locked in an Escape Room, designed by people about whom you know very little. The game has a dual purpose, to entertain its players and to advance the agenda of the group that created and controls it. To exit the game, you have to figure out the secrets of the room.
All players willingly suspend their disbelief when they enter the Escape-Room-World to experience the polarity generated by the game’s rules. The thrill of this “hero’s journey” is much like an immersive movie experience in an IMAX theatre. However, this adventure is not vicarious; the game is live and interactive.
The players create two teams and then choose sides. Team A’s members accept the room’s constraints and develop rules to keep everyone locked up for as long as possible. Team B’s members work diligently to figure out the secret behind the room’s design and craft an escape strategy. If Team B wins, everyone gets out right away, and the game ends.
Each team adopts a specific thought system, along with its related axioms, assumptions, definitions, and vocabulary.
Based on their team’s thought system, each player constructs a persona through which they relate to the other players. They do this by asking themselves. “What would I have to choose as true about myself if I wanted to convincingly dramatize the emotional experience and behavior of a person belonging to this particular group?”
(One of the unforeseen features of the game is its vivid contrast. The players of each team are all in plain sight. The door has clicked shut behind them. As the game progresses, it starkly highlights the position adopted by each player. There is no escape from that.)
On which side would you be? What strategies and alliances would you develop to win the game?
To begin with, I’m not a virus denier, and I follow the mandates and guidelines set out by our federal and provincial governments relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic. However, I do have an opinion about what’s going on.
My take is that this crisis is not as dangerous as it seems. Tragically, many people are getting sick, and some are dying, and that’s never a good thing. But the cases and death rates, which appear to be alarming, are reportedly being conflated with other causes.
Note the following examples, which I find confusing, if not downright equivocal.
“The number of COVID-19 deaths in Canada was 2028 as of April 23rd, 2020. Number of deaths related to COVID-19* Note: The total number includes publicly reported confirmed and probable cases Last Data Update 2020-04-23 11:00 EDT” https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/iframe/map.html
Following is a quote from an article published in The New England Journal of Medicine on February 28th, 2020, by Anthony S. Fauci, MD.
“If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) – Anthony S. Fauci, MD https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe200238
Note the over-use of qualifying language, such as the words ‘if,’ ‘assumes,’ ‘may be,’ and ‘suggests.’
To what exactly does ‘This suggests’ refer? The antecedent is unclear. Does ‘a severe seasonal influenza’ refer to a specific outbreak? The indefinite article is redundant. Why use it? If this is an example of the Science that is presented by Dr. Fauci as justification for the draconian mandates that are being rolled out, shouldn’t the language be exact?
Health experts are terrifying everyone with computer models that are continually being revised as the narrative changes. The legacy media is deliberately scaring everyone, and a frightened population is syndicating their story on social media. In my opinion, this is crisis initiation.
I also think that most of our politicians are trapped between a rock and a hard place. Their political survival depends on taking this narrative seriously, and rightly so. However, does this necessitate the arbitrary imposition of incrementally severe restrictions, some of which are illogical and self-contradictory?
Politicians are trapped between a rock and a hard place
People have been intimidated or forced into compliance, at the expense of hard-won individual rights. Some in their panic have abandoned all critical thinking and common sense.
Virtue signalers on social media are frantically posting to gain favor with peers. Some businesses are engaging in deceptive practices and price gouging to leverage the crisis for their commercial gain.
Is this really our new normal? Considering the amount of push back online, from people with impeccable credentials and long histories of journalistic integrity, I think a turn around is imminent.
Acquiescence to the illusion of power is how we got into the present state of affairs. I do not consent and this is post evidences my full declaration of sovereignty. There is no concurrent jurisdiction in this case. This is now a matter of law as decreed by the watchers/archangels.
On Good Friday, Jesus was illegally arrested and compelled to appear before Pilate at the bar of Roman justice. Judas and the Sanhedrin had formalized their contractual agreement by a commercial exchange of 30 pieces of silver, in a bogus attempt to legitimize this reprehensible action.
Later, when Judas attempted to renege on the contract he had made, he found himself hung by his tongue. The judge threw the case out of court, and Judas’ felt that his only recourse was to commit suicide. (He knew that what he had done was illegal, and sooner or later he would be held accountable for Jesus’ death, along with the rest of these criminals.)
Jesus, however, knew the rules of the game they were playing. “But Iesus did not commit himselfe vnto them, because he knew al men, And needed not that any should testifie of man: for hee knew what was in man.” John Chap 2 verse 24-25 – 1611 KJV
He showed us the way to escape from the commercial system that has been in play since Adam and Eve were beguiled, a corrupt system that subjugates us to this day – the corporations and courts of Babylon.
And the LORD God said vnto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The Serpent beguiled me, and I did eate. Genesis Chap 3 verse 13 – 1611 KJV
The serpent beguiled me and I did eat … 🍎
First of all, Jesus never signed anything, never gave his consent, never agreed in any way to be subject to Pilate’s jurisdiction.
“Hee was led as a sheepe to the slaughter, & like a Lambe dumbe before the shearer, so opened he not his mouth:” Acts Chap 8 vers 32– 1611 KJV
Jesus then claimed that his case was outside of Pilate’s authority; if it were under Roman jurisdiction, he would have been adequately represented by an attorney, who would have defended him and fought for his release.
“Iesus answered, My kingdome is not of this world: if my kingdome were of this world, then would my seruants fight, that I should not be deliuered to the Iewes: but now is my kingdome not from hence.” John Chap 18 verse 36– 1611 KJV
What did he mean by ‘not of this world’? Who is the Queen of England swearing to when she takes her oath to uphold and defend the Bible? Who are the President and the federal, state, and local officials in the USA swearing to when they take their oaths of office on the Bible? Those individuals who administer or witness such oaths do not have the power to enforce them. Who does? Moreover, these oaths are made by individuals, in a jurisdiction that is outside of the corporate system and their courts.
Jesus clarified where the real power lay.
“Thou couldest haue no power at all against me, except it were giuen thee from aboue:” John Chap 19 verse 11 – 1611 KJV )
What did he mean by ‘from above’? Could this refer to an off-planet jurisdiction?
Pilate said that he could find no fault with Jesus – in other words, there was nothing with which the Roman justice system could charge him. He was therefore delivered back to the Sanhedrin, who illegally delivered him up for crucifixion.
“When the chiefe Priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucifie him, crucifie him. Pilate saith vnto them, Take ye him, and crucifie him: for I find no fault in him.” John 19 verse 6 – 1611 KJV
He then demonstrated for us the Key of Identity, how to pass ourselves under the rod of right identification, how to claim our God-given heritage as generic man. God has given this ‘man’ and this ‘woman’ dominion. As such, we are subject to the higher jurisdiction of the kingdom of heaven, subordinate to the harmonious reign and rule of God’s laws.
“And God said, Let vs make man in our Image, after our likenesse: and let them haue dominion ouer the fish of the sea, and ouer the foule of the aire, and ouer the cattell, and ouer all the earth, and ouer euery creeping thing that creepeth vpon the earth.: Genesis Chap 1 verse 26 – 1611 KJV
He showed us that there was a method of recourse and that there was a higher court that guaranteed compensation in the event that we are harmed.
“Reward her euen as she rewarded you, and double vnto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled, fill to her double.” Revelations Chap 18 verse 6 – 1611 KJV
Jesus showed us that the courts of Babylon did not have concurrent jurisdiction over him, and that a trial and sentence by their ‘system of justice’ was illegal. This is why Pilate washed his hands of the matter.
He showed us that the harm that this corrupt system causes us will be fully recompensed, even if we are seemingly murdered. The watchers – the archangels Gabriel and Michael, or their representatives – will be there at the tomb, and there will be restitution, even to the point of resurrection and ascension.
This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demaund by the word of the Holy ones: to the intent that the liuing may know, that the most High ruleth in the kingdome of men, and giueth it to whomsoeuer hee will, and setteth vp ouer it the basest of men. Daniel IV verse 17– 1611 KJV
The Bible is more than a collection of metaphorical statements and allegories designed to make us feel better or give us comfort while we suffer. Its a Law book with case studies. The dominion that God contracted with us in Genesis is actual, real, practical, but It must be understood and claimed.
Acquiescence to the illusion of power is how we got into the present state of affairs in the first place.
Jesus is our way-shower. He means us to be attorneys. We have to begin to stand up for ourselves, to learn the correct way to say no to the individuals in the system that are trying to trick us into a smaller box than they themselves are in.
Men’s careers and reputations are being unfairly and peremptorily trashed. If there was an agenda behind this, the strategy is classic Saul Alinsky. Here’s how that would go.
Someone decides to contact the Media about an incident that allegedly happened decades ago. Ignoring the all-too-convenient timing of this allegation, the Media proceeds to report the story, skillfully framing it in such a way that leads its audience to presume the man is already guilty of an actual crime. Before he has a chance to defend himself, the Media Version is broadcasted and syndicated through various amplifiers, until it is accepted by the general public – as fact. The accusations are bolstered with references to high profile crimes that have actually been committed by men against women, in order to further augment his assumed guilt by a process of association. The social media audience, goaded by various trolls and virtue signallers, enters into an extended discussion. Certain ideologues pivot the narrative to point out the political, social and patriarchal evils that his alleged action illustrates, in an attempt to strengthen and gather followers for their particular ideology.
If there is due process in the courts, then shouldn’t there be due process in the media? Conversations like the one here go a long way towards redress and are therefore vitally important. The coordinated savaging of men online and in the main stream media is now a huge issue. This is why we need to restore free speech in Canada. Men who have the courage to step up and question prevailing neo-Marxist, Post Modernist and Fourth-Wave Feminist ideologies are now at greater risk of having their reputations and careers ruined. Our male children are being branded with the stigma of toxic masculinity and systematically indoctrinated in government controlled schools and universities. A significant percentage of male children are being chemically emasculated through the prescription of dangerous and addictive pharmaceuticals.
Are we really ready to sanction the attempt by the Media Party to co-opt our judicial process and set itself up as judge and jury? If the courts are failing women, then isn’t there something seriously wrong with our system of justice, and wouldn’t everyone be at risk from such corruption? How does all this further the cause of developing strong and independent women? Is trial by media really the best way to counter the horrible abuse committed by some men against women?
