“Rather than quarrel over vaccination I recommend, if the law demand, that an individual submit to this process, that he obey the law, and then appeal to the gospel to save him from bad physical results. Whatever changes come to this century or to any epoch, we may safely submit to the providence of God, to common justice, to the maintenance of individual rights, and to governmental usages.” – Mary Baker Eddy (MBE) in Prose Works
MBE is talking about a vaccine, not an experimental medical device. Medical experiments are outlawed by the Nuremberg Code unless individual consent is given. She is also taking about a system which upholds common justice, individual rights and government usages related to a robust Constitutional Republic, not a decaying nation whose corporate legislature and system of justice have apparently been infiltrated and compromised by hostile foreign powers.
Therefore, substitute the word ‘poison’ into this paragraph and see if it still makes sense. The government is trying to coerce you into taking poison.
When Paul shook off the poisonous viper and suffered no ill effects, still, he didn’t voluntarily put his hand in the serpents mouth in order to temp God. Neither did Jesus throw himself off a cliff and then call for legions of angels to save him.
Imagine a practitioner with a patient who says, “I knew from my research that this was not a ‘vaccine’ but a medical device; and that certain public health officials had stealthily changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ to include it. I also knew that apparently dangerous side effects were being reported, that people were getting really sick and even dying.
However, I decided to allow myself to be injected with this substance because: my Government deceptively and illegally coerced me by requiring businesses to allow only those who had a COVID-ID (Certificate of Vaccination ID) passport to shop or travel; the Media claimed that the ‘vaccine’ was ‘approved’ (which is false); my Relatives pressured me to get vaccinated or I couldn’t see my grandchildren; my Employer said that if I didn’t get the jab they would fire me; and finally most of my so-called Friends persuaded me. Please heal me of its adverse effects.”
MBE gives the analogy of powerful mental opposition employed by a legislator to defeat the passage of an inhuman law. In connection with these ‘vaccines’, shouldn’t Christian Science treatment be given to establish freedom from coercion requiring us to submit to this tyranny, rather than to be protected from the adverse effects of a poison after it is voluntarily injected?